Apple vs. Samsung Jury to Face 700+ Questions on Verdict Form - rankintwen1982

Imagine the longest, most complex government contour you've ever so had to fill come out of the closet and you start to have an idea what jurors will face A they begin to consider their finding of fact in the unobstructed infringement case between Apple and Samsung.

The verdict form, a tentative version of which was filed to the San Jose District Court happening Monday, runs to 22 pages and has 36 main questions. But the nettle is in the inside information: Because there are so many patents, products and company subsidiaries involved, there are more than 700 individual questions to consider.

The first few ask out whether Apple has proven that Samsung infringed along the several Apple patents at the center of the case. Simple enough, right? Wrong.

Jurors will have to decide not only if if Samsung Electronics infringed on the patents, but also whether its subsidiaries, Samsung Electronics America and Samsung Telecommunications, did so as well. And they will have to do so for capable 24 individual handsets.

That means that question one unsocial — "For from each one of the following products, has Apple proven by a preponderance of the show that Samsung Electronics Co. (SEC), Samsung Electronics America (SEA), and/or Samsung Telecommunications America (STA) has infringed Claim 19 of the '381 Patent?" — has 57 individual boxes that need to be filled in.

The form indicates the complexity of the arguments that have been made in the encase over the past few weeks. Mop up arguments are set for Tuesday, afterwards which the jury will begin its deliberations. There's no indication how weeklong that May take.

Likewise on the form are several questions relating to medium of exchange amends, and they besides are not needfully straightforward.

Interrogative 24 is simple sufficient — "What is the sum up dollar amount that Apple is entitled to receive from Samsung on the claims on which you stimulate ruled in favor of of Apple?" — simply doubtfulness 25 asks the jury to list a dislocation of some damages awarded past each of 28 models of cellphone.

The case is 11-01846, Apple v Samsung, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Martyn Williams covers mobile telecoms, Silicon Valley and generic technology break newsworthiness for The IDG Word Armed service. Follow Martyn on Twitter at @martyn_williams. Martyn's e-chain mail address is martyn_williams@idg.com

Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/460775/apple_v_samsung_jury_to_face_700_questions_on_verdict_form.html

Posted by: rankintwen1982.blogspot.com